Short answer

No Reference required

Please explain how we as a society could possibly reduce human needs without increasing human suffering?

Does corporate involvement in the development and marketing of a new technology invalidate the technology?

Is it true that if greater oversight of an industry (such as the shale gas industry) costs a few more bucks, in the interest of public health, it’s worth it?

Should the Genetic Engineering technology be a reparative one, reserved for making sick humans healthy again, or should it be used to augment our current physical restrictions, making us bigger, faster, stronger, and smarter?

Why is protecting habitat important for protecting species?

Click here if you need to order 100% original answer to this question